Research Settles Age-Old Debate Over Who's Smarter: You, Or Your Sibling?

First-borns always knew it to be true, but now, they have research to back them up.

A new study published in the Journal of Human Resources has revealed that first-born children tend to be smarter than their younger siblings.

University of Edinburgh researchers believe this may have something to do with the fact that first-born children receive more mental stimulation from parents during their early formative years. 

The study gathered data from the U.S. Children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, in which 5,000 children were monitored and assessed every two years until adolescence. The assessments spanned categories from reading to vocabulary to matching letters. Information about the children’s environmental factors, including family background and economic conditions, was also gathered.

As early as age one, the research found that first-borns excelled over their younger siblings. While younger siblings received the same emotional support as their older counterparts, it was revealed that parents tend to give first-born children more support when it comes to tasks that develop thinking skills, like reading, crafting and playing instruments. 

The researchers also found that mothers took more risks – like increased smoking – during pregnancies with second and third children.

The researchers say these findings might shed light on the “birth order effect”, wherein first-born children tend to make more money or get higher education than their younger siblings.

“Broad shifts in parental behavior are a plausible explanation for the observed birth order differences in education and labor market outcomes,” said study author Ana Nuevo-Chiquero of the University of Edinburgh School of Economics.

First-borns, try not to lord this information over your younger siblings too much; if you must, be sure to explain it very slowly.

h/t Paste Magazine 


For cannabis enthusiasts living in adult use states, long gone are the days of sneaking around with a dime bag in a coat pocket and worrying about whether the neighbors know you’ve got weed. But the sad truth is that, for millions of Americans living in prohibition or restrictive medical-only states, accessing safe and regulated cannabis is still a problem. But does that mean that those living without access to the regulated market are abstaining from cannabis altogether?

Can we see some ID please?

You must be 19 years of age or older to enter.