Big Pharma Will Lose $4 Billion Per Year Due to Medical Marijuana

One of the not-so-secret aspects of the fight against marijuana legalization is that pharmaceutical companies are actively campaigning against it out of fear they'll lose money. Well, according to a new report, Big Pharma actually does have a lot to fear.

A recent report found that Big Pharma stands to lose as much as $4 billion per year if medical marijuana became legal in all 50 states. The information is based off a study from 2016 by the University of Georgia, which found that states with legalized medicinal cannabis had less Medicare prescriptions than those where it's still illegal. The study found that already pharmaceutical companies are losing $166 million annually on drugs where marijuana is now offered as an alternative.

The study also identified nine areas where medical marijuana will most affect Big Pharma: Anxiety, chronic pain, epilepsy, post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep disorders, nerve pain, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, Tourette syndrome and glaucoma. The researchers found that even if marijuana was only prescribed in a small percentage of these cases, pharmaceutical companies could lose as much as $4 to 5 billion. 

While that sounds like a tremendous amount of money, it's really just a small dip for the pharmaceutical industry, which is currently valued at $425 billion. And it's even less noteworthy when you consider those losses will be spread out amongst multiple companies. Pfizer, one of the largest Big Pharma companies, estimates they will only lose $500 million out of their $53 billion revenue due to medical marijuana.

But we're guessing even with these small losses, Big Pharma is donating heavily to politicians who claim marijuana leads to drug addiction. I'm sure that's just a coincidence.

(h/t Salon)

Latest.

On his nightly talk series, Fox News host Tucker Carlson defended his now-viral freakout during an unaired interview, which has since generated a great deal of attention online. Carlson has risen to fame thanks to his undeniable knack for getting under the skin of liberals and progressives. So left-leaning pundits were probably only too happy to see Carlson him owned by one of their peers this week, when Dutch historian Rutger Bregman shared a covertly recorded version his unaired interview with the cantankerous conservative.

Can we see some ID please?

You must be 19 years of age or older to enter.